Every coding interview prep journey starts with the same Google search and ends at the same three doors: Blind 75 (the famous minimal problem list), NeetCode (the list, expanded and taught on video), or a structured day-by-day plan like our 60-day study plan.
All three work. People have landed FAANG offers with each. But they’re built on different assumptions about what you already know, how much time you have, and how you learn, and picking the wrong one for your situation is how people end up 40 problems into a list they don’t understand, convinced they’re “not an algorithms person.”
Here’s the honest comparison, including where our own approach is not the right answer.
Quick Comparison: NeetCode vs Blind 75 vs 60-Day Plan
| Criteria | Blind 75 | NeetCode 150 | 60-Day Plan |
|---|---|---|---|
| Format | Curated problem list | Problem list + video solutions | Sequential daily lessons + exercises |
| Problem/lesson count | 75 problems | 150 problems (250 with extensions) | 60 lessons, one per day |
| Time required | 2–4 weeks | 6–10 weeks | 60 days, ~1 hr/day |
| Teaching depth | None (problems only) | Good (video per problem) | Deepest (concepts before problems) |
| Structure / ordering | Loose topic grouping | Roadmap by pattern | Fully sequenced day by day |
| Assumes DS&A foundation | Yes, strong | Yes, moderate | No, builds it from Day 1 |
| Cost | Free | Free (Pro ~$120/yr optional) | Free to start |
| Weakness | Teaches nothing new | Passive video-watching trap | Slower to pure problem reps |
If you only remember one thing: the lists assume a foundation; the plan builds one. Everything below is that sentence, expanded.
Blind 75: The Minimalist List
Blind 75 is a list of 75 LeetCode problems posted on Blind by a Meta engineer, chosen so that the patterns behind them cover most of what interviews ask. As curation, it’s genuinely brilliant: there is no higher-signal set of 75 problems anywhere, which is why it has survived years of newer, shinier lists.
But Blind 75 is a test, not a course. It contains zero teaching. If you look at “Longest Increasing Subsequence” and don’t already know dynamic programming, the list’s answer is: you shouldn’t be on this list yet. Using it without a foundation means reading solutions, nodding, and memorizing, which collapses the moment an interviewer changes one constraint.
Best for: engineers with a solid DS&A background (recent grads, people who’ve interviewed before) who need a sharp, fast review. As a final-two-weeks polish, it’s unbeatable.
Wrong for: anyone who needs to learn the underlying material. That’s not a knock: it was never designed to teach.
NeetCode: The List, Taught
NeetCode started as Blind 75 with YouTube solutions and grew into the NeetCode 150 (and 250), organized into a pattern-based roadmap (arrays → two pointers → sliding window → trees → graphs → DP) with a clear, well-produced video for every problem. It’s free, the explanations are excellent, and the roadmap ordering is sensible. For many people searching for a NeetCode alternative, the honest first answer is: NeetCode is very good at what it does.
Its failure mode is subtler than Blind 75’s: the video trap. Watching someone solve a problem feels like progress and produces almost none. NeetCode’s format makes it comfortable to attempt a problem for four minutes, watch the video, understand it perfectly, and move on, having practiced recognition instead of recall. Interviews test recall, out loud, under time pressure. NeetCode also still assumes you know the fundamentals; the videos explain this problem’s solution, not heaps or graph theory from first principles.
Best for: self-driven learners with moderate fundamentals and 6–10 weeks, who have the discipline to struggle before hitting play.
Wrong for: true beginners, and anyone who knows they learn by watching instead of doing and needs structure to prevent it.
The 60-Day Plan: The Structured Course
The 60-day plan inverts the model: instead of a problem list that assumes knowledge, it’s a sequenced curriculum that builds it, one lesson per day, from algorithmic thinking and time complexity through hash tables, dynamic programming, and backtracking, with exercises and Python implementations at every step. The full curriculum is laid out day by day, and each day fits in about an hour.
The design bets on two things. First, concepts before problems: you learn what a heap is, implement it, and only then meet “top k elements,” so the pattern transfers to problems you’ve never seen. Second, default structure: “do Day 23 today” survives a tired Tuesday far better than “pick something from this list of 150,” which is exactly when list-based prep quietly dies.
Fairness requires stating the trade-off plainly: 60 days is slower to raw problem reps than either list. If your interview is in two weeks, a curriculum is the wrong tool. And after finishing it, you should still do interview-format reps, which is why our own recommendation below combines approaches rather than crowning one.
Best for: self-taught developers, career changers, engineers whose fundamentals have rusted, and anyone who has already bounced off a problem list once.
Wrong for: strong candidates with a live interview date inside three weeks. Use a list; come back later.
Which Should You Use? The Recommendation Matrix
| Your situation | Use this |
|---|---|
| Interview in ≤2 weeks, decent fundamentals | Blind 75, company-tagged questions, one mock, sleep |
| Interview in 4–8 weeks, solid fundamentals | NeetCode 150 by roadmap order, strict struggle-first rule |
| 2–3+ months, rusty or self-taught fundamentals | 60-Day Plan → NeetCode reps → Blind 75 final review |
| Failed a loop despite grinding problems | 60-Day Plan: pattern-memorization is usually the culprit |
| Complete beginner (learning to code) | Python primer first, then the 60-Day Plan |
Notice the third row: the best answer for most people with real lead time is all three, in sequence. Curriculum for the foundation, NeetCode for interview-format reps on top of it, Blind 75 as the final-week compression. They’re not actually competitors. They’re stages. The mistake is entering the pipeline at the wrong stage for your current knowledge, and the full FAANG prep guide covers how to sequence those stages (plus mocks, behavioral, and company differences) in detail.
Other NeetCode Alternatives, Briefly
The three doors above cover most searches, but a few other names come up often enough to address:
- Striver’s SDE Sheet / A2Z course: the most popular list in the Indian prep ecosystem (bigger than NeetCode 150, video-taught, free). Same category and same caveats as NeetCode: excellent reps, assumes fundamentals, video-trap risk. Pick one; doing both is resource-hopping with extra steps.
- AlgoMonster / Grokking-style pattern courses: paid courses organized by pattern rather than problem. Genuinely good middle ground between a list and a curriculum, but you’re paying mostly for sequencing, which free options above also provide. Reasonable if their teaching style clicks for you.
- LeetCode’s own study plans (Top Interview 150, etc.): fine problem selections, weakest teaching layer of anything listed here. Better as a source of extra reps than as a primary plan.
- “Just grind LeetCode by acceptance rate”: the null plan. This is what everyone does by default, and it’s the approach every option in this article exists to save you from.
The pattern in every case is the same question: does it teach, or does it test? Know which one you need before choosing, and you can evaluate any new resource the moment it appears.
Common Questions
Is Blind 75 still enough in 2026? As a review tool, yes: patterns age slowly; arrays and BFS aren’t going anywhere. As your only prep, it was never enough, in any year. Interview pools have also drifted toward more graph and heap questions than the list’s era, which NeetCode’s extensions cover better.
Should I do NeetCode 150 or 250? 150. The extra hundred problems are for people who’ve finished the 150 with time to spare (which, statistically, you will not have). Depth on 150 beats coverage of 250.
Can I do the 60-day plan in 30 days? Yes: two lessons a day at 90–120 minutes. The study plan includes compressed variants. What you shouldn’t compress is the review habit; spaced repetition is the mechanism that makes the whole thing stick.
Do any of these cover system design or behavioral rounds? No. All three are DS&A-only. For the full loop (system design, behavioral, company differences, timelines), see the complete FAANG prep guide.
I finished a list and still failed. What happened? Almost always one of two things: you practiced recognition instead of recall (watched solutions, nodded, moved on), or you never practiced performing: solving out loud, under time, with a human watching. The fix is a foundation plus mock interviews, not a third list.
What’s the best LeetCode study plan overall, then? For most people with 8+ weeks: foundation via the 60-day curriculum, reps via NeetCode 150, compression via Blind 75, plus 2–3 mock interviews in the final stretch. That sequence uses each tool for exactly what it’s good at, and it’s entirely free except the optional mocks.
The Uncomfortable Truth About All Three
Whichever door you pick, the outcome is decided by two behaviors none of the resources can do for you:
- Finish one thing. A completed Blind 75 beats an abandoned NeetCode 150 beats a sampled-then-shelved everything. Resource-hopping is the #1 cause of failed prep: pick based on the matrix above, then refuse to switch.
- Produce, don’t consume. Type the code. Say the reasoning out loud. Re-solve last week’s problems from a blank editor. The medium doesn’t matter; the output does.
If you’ve read this far and you’re still choosing, here’s the tiebreaker: the approach you’ll actually show up for daily is the right one. If structure is what keeps you showing up, the structured one is free to try: Day 1 takes twenty minutes.
Get the free 60-day algorithm study plan